Poem analysis of Digging (1966) by Seamus Heaney Essay

Poem analysis of take (1966) by Seamus Heaney - Essay ExampleThe first experience, the pen, also serves as a frame for the poem, appearing in the second line of the poem and the thirtieth line. These images contrast the purposes of each implement. The cashier of the poem appears to be a writer. His ancestors are all farmers. The tools they used all had a specific purpose that resulted in a bearing of life, farming. By becoming a writer, the narrator has broken the mold of his family. Throughout the poem, he considers the spade his have and grandfather used, and the pen is obviously not as useful in a physical sentience as the spade. But, by comparing the pen to a gun, the narrator is giving it power. The pen cannot gather food for thought from the earth or split turf to sell, but the words it creates can be as potent as a gun. Words have inspired wars and resulted in the imprisonment of writers.The next juxtaposed images are of the father gardening and the father take potat oes. In the first stanza, the narrator is composing at a window. While he is writing, his father is below the window digging in flower beds. This image thrusts the narrator into the past where he remembers his father digging potatoes. The juxtaposed images are present in the line, I have a bun in the oven down / Till his straining rump among the flowerbeds / Bends low, comes up twenty years away (Heaney 5-7). This image mirrors the thoughts of the narrator close the usefulness of his pen. The father once engaged in meaningful work with his shovel, digging potatoes, but he now spends his time digging in flower beds. The narrator feels the same about his ancestry and his current occupation. He is a writer, which is the practical equivalent of digging in flower beds preferably of in a potato patch. The image continues as the narrator travels back to memories of his grandfather, who used his tools for one purpose, caustic peat. For the narrator, the value of a tool seems to